Thursday Reviews: Desperation by Stephen King

Desperation

Stephen King

A couple is pulled over in the Nevada desert by a cop who finds a baggy of pot in the car. It’s one of those instances where a trip to the police station would clear up everything. Instead, the cop is crazed, swearing at the couple and punctuating his speech with the word “tak.” When they arrive in Desperation, Nevada, population 0, formerly about 250, they find a house of horrors. The cop has taken prisoner a family of five, killing their six-year-old daughter, and a burned-out literary wonder who passed through on a Harley on trip to revive his career. Desperation is not just another forgotten Western mining town. The mining company uncovered something bad. Something very bad.

The cop is possessed by Tak, a primitive entity too old to be a demon. However, Tak, via David Carver, runs afoul of God. Yeah, that God. The one in the Bible. But King’s God proves to be a rather edgy, if still distant, character. One theme that runs through the novel is that God is cruel. However, that’s not necessarily a bad thing, but usually is extremely difficult to endure.

This one is a bit messy. King goes through each abduction in something other than chronological order, which makes this hard to follow for the first 200 pages. Once the battle between Tak and his captives begins in earnest, it finds its groove. While not mentioned in the novel, The Dark Tower‘s presence looms. You know Tak is something Roland Deschane will eventually have to confront, and the protags, though never stated, forms a ka-tet, a group whom fate has tasked with a mission. It’s slow going and not as clear as Insomnia or The Green Mile (which seems to exist outside the King universe, as does Carrie.)

About these ads

2 thoughts on “Thursday Reviews: Desperation by Stephen King

  1. I hadn’t read a Stephen King book in a while so when I saw Desperation on the shelf, I went for it.. Loved it through the first half and then as I started to plow through the rest of the book, it was then that I was reminded why I had stopped reading King to begin with. It seems like he just can’t resist going on and on about what every evil thought a character is thinking and all possible references to any and all pop culture images and ideas. I mean he literary stops the action and flow of the book right there in the middle of the book as it is moving towards the end of the story. I tried skim reading it and hoping that it would be getting better towards the end. But his trivial drivel just didn’t stop. So I had to put it down.. I just couldn’t finish it. Amazing all the investment I put into the characters and story, but it seems like King just wanted not to end the book until he wrote another 200 pages. As if he was saying, “I am such a great writer, I know that you just want to keep on reading this story ad nauseum”.
    I wont be reading any new works of his, but I will probably continue to read any of his older books that were written before he became so full of himself.
    George Orwell said it best “If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.”. Of course poetic language and descriptive references are always welcome in any work of fiction, but King over the years has become a bore.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s